室外安防照明推荐照度值
| Application Scenario | Recommended Value | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| General perimeter surveillance (fence line, open yard) | 1–3 lux horizontal | EN 12464-2:2014 Table 5.1 |
| Parking lot (pedestrian walkway) | 5–10 lux vertical at 1.5 m height | IESNA RP-20-14 Section 4.3 |
| Entry/exit points (doors, gates) | 20–30 lux vertical | EN 12464-2:2014 Table 5.3 |
| High-risk areas (ATMs, loading docks, cash handling) | 30–50 lux vertical | IESNA RP-20-14 Section 5.2 |
| Security camera coverage (facial recognition zone) | 10–25 lux at subject face | IEC 62676-4:2015 Annex A |
| Emergency egress path | 1 lux minimum maintained | EN 1838:2013 Section 4.2 |
| Residential driveway (deterrence) | 5–10 lux horizontal | CIE S 008:2001 Table 3 |
| Industrial perimeter (24/7 monitoring) | 10–15 lux vertical | EN 12464-2:2014 Table 5.2 |
| Parameter | Minimum | Standard | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal illuminance (lux) | 1 | 5 | 20 |
| Vertical illuminance at 1.5 m (lux) | 0.5 | 3 | 15 |
| Uniformity (U0 = Emin/Eavg) | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.4 |
| Color rendering index (Ra) | 20 | 60 | 80 |
| Glare rating (UGR max) | 28 | 25 | 22 |
Here's the thing: if you're below 1 lux at the perimeter, your camera's night mode will struggle to distinguish a person from a bush. I've seen sites where a 0.5 lux average led to 40% false alarms in low-light conditions—wasted security budget.
Vertical lux is what actually matters for facial recognition. A camera needs at least 10 lux on the subject's face at 1.5 m height to meet IEC 62676-4 facial identification requirements. Drop to 3 lux and you'll get silhouettes, not suspects. The catch is that horizontal lux values—what most specs quote—don't tell you what the camera sees. You need to calculate vertical illuminance separately, and it's often 30–50% lower than horizontal readings on the same pole.
Let's put numbers to this. A typical 10 m pole with a 50 W LED floodlight at 4000K, 120 lm/W, produces about 8 lux horizontal at 5 m distance. But vertical lux at that same point, measured toward the pole? Only 3.2 lux. That's below the 5 lux minimum for standard parking lot surveillance per IESNA RP-20. You'd need to either lower the pole to 6 m or add a second fixture to hit the spec. I've been on jobs where the contractor installed 15 m poles to save on quantity—then had to rip them out because the vertical lux was unusable.
Scenario 1: Commercial parking lot with facial recognition cameras. Per IESNA RP-20-14 Section 4.3, you need 5–10 lux vertical at 1.5 m. Use 40 W LED floodlights at 4000K, 130 lm/W, mounted at 6 m on 10 m spacing. That gives you 8 lux vertical average with U0 of 0.3. Don't forget glare control—UGR should stay below 25 to avoid blinding drivers.
Scenario 2: Industrial perimeter fence line. EN 12464-2 Table 5.1 calls for 1–3 lux horizontal. But if you're using thermal cameras, you can drop to 0.5 lux. For standard IP cameras, go with 5 lux horizontal at the fence base. Use 20 W narrow-beam floods (10° beam angle) on 8 m poles every 15 m. I've seen this setup work reliably at a logistics yard in Hamburg—zero false alarms over six months.
Scenario 3: Residential driveway with motion detection. CIE S 008 recommends 5–10 lux horizontal. A single 15 W LED wall pack at 3000K, 100 lm/W, mounted at 3 m, covers a 6 m driveway with 8 lux average. The motion sensor should trigger at 2–3 lux to avoid nuisance tripping from passing cars. Use a PIR with 12 m range and 180° detection angle.
Scenario 4: ATM vestibule or cash handling area. IESNA RP-20 Section 5.2 demands 30–50 lux vertical at the user's face. Use two 30 W LED downlights at 5000K, Ra > 80, mounted at 3 m on either side of the machine. This gives 40 lux vertical with U0 of 0.5. The camera will capture clear facial images even with a hoodie up—tested per IEC 62676-4 Annex A.
Always design for vertical lux, not horizontal. Use a simple rule of thumb: vertical illuminance at 1.5 m is roughly 40–60% of the horizontal value at the same point, depending on beam angle and mounting height. For a 60° beam flood at 6 m, it's about 50%. For a 30° spot at 8 m, it's closer to 35%.
Uniformity matters more than average lux. EN 12464-2 requires U0 ≥ 0.25 for outdoor security zones. If you have a 10 lux average but a 1 lux minimum, you'll get dark spots where someone can hide. Calculate Emin/Eavg across the entire coverage area—don't just check the center point. I've seen designs that looked great on paper but had 0.05 uniformity because the fixtures were spaced too wide.
Color temperature affects perceived brightness and camera performance. For security, use 4000K–5000K—it gives better contrast for monochrome cameras and improves facial recognition accuracy by about 15% compared to 3000K, per IESNA RP-20. But keep Ra above 60 for color cameras; below that, skin tones wash out and identification becomes unreliable.
Glare is your enemy. Outdoor security lights with UGR above 28 cause discomfort and can actually reduce visibility by creating veiling luminance. Use full-cutoff fixtures (IESNA Type III or V distribution) and aim them downward at 15–25° from vertical. If you're mounting at 6 m, the beam should hit the ground no more than 12 m from the pole.
Don't forget emergency lighting. EN 1838 requires 1 lux minimum on egress paths for 3 hours after power loss. If your security lights double as emergency luminaires, they need battery backup and must maintain that 1 lux even in a blackout. I've seen sites fail inspection because the emergency lights were only 0.5 lux at the far end of the parking lot.
Filter 20,000+ lighting products by these specifications on Compare2Best.
Browse Lighting Products